In Node.js environment, both exports
and module.exports
are used to export modules. By default, they both point to the same memory space, but there are some differences in their functionality that allows them toting described as shorthand.
An important point to note is that, exports
is merely a shorthand for module.exports
. This means that when you define a module using exports
, you are actually using module.exports
under the hood. However, exports
cannot be directly assigned a value unlike module.exports
.
For instance, you can do the following with exports
:
exports.greet = function() {
console.log("Hello from Node.js");
};
And then use it in another module like so:
const greetings = require('./greetings');
greetings.greet(); // Outputs: "Hello from Node.js"
In this case, exports
adds the greet
method to the module's exports.
Another difference between exports
and module.exports
is in the number of elements they can export. With 'exports', you can export multiple objects, functions, or values. This makes it convenient to export several related items from a single module.
On the other hand, module.exports
, is typically used to export a single object, function, or value. For example:
module.exports = function() {
console.log("Hello from Node.js");
};
It's advisable to use module.exports
when exporting a single object, function, or value from a module and exports
when exporting multiple items. This makes your code more concise and readable.
Remember that if you assign a new object or a function directly to exports
, it will no longer be a shorthand for module.exports
, and module.exports
will still exist in its original form. This might cause unexpected results. Always use these two objects carefully and consistently, understanding the implications of their implementation.
By understanding and utilizing the difference between 'exports' and 'module.exports', developers can effectively manage and structure their Node.js applications, promoting clean, clear, and maintainable code.